I am ashamed to say that I once admired the state of Israel. I thought they were a brave people, fighting and winning against overwhelming odds. Not anymore, and videos like the one you are about to see are the reason why.
…
HAARP, the US Defense Department’s High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, has become an internet buzzword. The phenomena has been blamed for earthquakes, sinkholes, and freakish weather. I have always considered HAARP to be a fringe theory, and haven’t researched these alleged claims.
That was until I saw the following videos.
…
…
…
…
…
HAARP is real, an ongoing Defense Department research project. The question is; Is HAARP merely an experimental radio frequency program, or a sinister weapon? Here is an excerpt from haarp.net:
Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope; antenna send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything — living and dead.
HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However, other U.S. military documents put it more clearly — HAARP aims to learn how to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.”
A vial of Pandremix, the A(h1N1) vaccine, is seen on a desk at the Sisli Etfal Hospital in Istanbul on November 2nd, 2009.
The virulent swine flu has killed 656 people across Turkey since October, a month after the country went on a nationwide vaccination campaign against the pandemic.
“A total of 656 people, confirmed by laboratories (to have been infected), have lost their lives as of July 29, 2010,” the Turkish health ministry said in a statement on Thursday.
The report said the authorities had used about half of the 3 million doses of vaccine they had bought to fight the flu, defusing rumors that the supplies had not been applied.
The A/H1N1 virus raised alarms in November, when it claimed most of its victims among the 71-million Turks.
The World Health Organization declared a swine flu pandemic on June 11, 2009, and says the disease has killed some 18,311 people worldwide.
This week the website WikiLeaks released tens of thousands of Army documents related to the war in Afghanistan. The documents reveal gruesome facts about civilian deaths as well as U.S. foreign intelligence.
There’s been some speculation by bloggers, including John Young of Cryptome.com, that the leak is part of a disinformation operation, and that the documents themselves could even be fake, their release to the press an act of collusion between the government and WikiLeaks. This is because of the fact that the leaked documents are digital files with no signature to prove their authenticity, that they were released immediately to the mainstream media instead of directly to the public on the web, and that their release has been covered extensively by the American press, when in the past the issue of civilian deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq have been downplayed by the mainstream media…even ignored.
So far, there’s no evidence yet to prove that the White House or the Pentagon conspired with WikiLeaks to stage the documents’ release– just speculation. One might wonder why the U.S. government would want to do such a thing when the information in the documents paint a grim picture of the war in Afghanistan as a hopeless, bloody waste of money and human life. But when you peel away the hype of the WikiLeaks story the truth is that this realization is not a new one for many Americans who have turned their backs to the mainstream media and are getting their news from the Internet and other sources. Even people who don’t follow the news closely know that the Afghan War is in its ninth year with no end in sight and that soldiers are continuing to die in it. Every week local newspapers around America feature stories of young men and women from their areas who were killed in action.
It could be that the White House is looking for a quick resolution to the fighting and to cut a deal with the Taliban, allowing them to slowly conquer the country again during a U.S. draw-down, “forced” by public outrage over the leak and the continuing bloodshed, while still allowing the U.S. to exploit the treasure trove of natural resources there. Indeed, the U.S. already pays off the Taliban– through private contractors– not to attack trucking convoys. Reducing troops while maintaining a grip on Afghanistan’s untouched wealth would allow the U.S. to keep the spoils of war while at the same focusing its military resources on the next target– Iran.
Already Fox News has exploited the WikiLeaks documents to further vilify Iran, pointing out that the documents indicate the U.S. belief that Iran is arming the Taliban insurgency. This adds another layer to Fox’s steady stream of propaganda that has flowed over the years advocating for an attack on the country, and stands as the second reason why some believe the leak was staged.
President Ahmadinejad of Iran has denied the charges that his government supports Taliban insurgents.
Prior to Ahmadinejad’s coming to power, while the U.S. planned the invasion of Afghanistan, Iran helped organize the Northern Alliance against the Taliban. Though the U.S. has downplayed Iran’s role in the early days of the war, U.S. soldiers and officials have conceded that Iranian forces were present with the Afghan rebels in 2001. In his 2006 article, “How Neocons Sabotaged Iran’s Help on al-Qaeda” author Gareth Porter wrote:
“After the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. officials responsible for preparing for war in Afghanistan needed Iran’s help to unseat the Taliban and establish a stable government in Kabul. Iran had organized resistance by the Northern Alliance and had provided arms and funding at a time when the United States had been unwilling to do so.”
The article quotes Flynt Leverett– senior director for Middle East affairs in the National Security Council at the time– who said that State Department and NSC officials met secretly with Iranian diplomats in October, 2001 to discuss “how to effectively unseat the Taliban and once the Taliban was gone, how to stand up an Afghan government.”
The State Department’s policy planning staff wrote a paper in November 2001 recommending that the U.S. pursue more formal cooperation with Iran in fighting al-Qaeda. Yet collaboration with Iran in Afghanistan would have involved equal sharing of information about al-Qaeda between the two countries, and since the Bush administration had already decided to include Iran on its “axis of evil” hit-list by then, the U.S. turned its back on the idea.
As Neocons use the WikiLeaks story of Iranian efforts to hamper the U.S. occupation of its neighbor in order to push their agenda, no doubt they will overlook the fact that in 2007 the CIA received presidential approval to mount a covert operation to destabilize Iran’s government. It’s even less likely that they’ll mention that Iran’s democratically elected government was overthrown by the CIA and replaced by the heavy-handed Shah– a U.S. puppet– when it wanted to nationalize its oil fields back in 1953.
Such facts aren’t convenient for a U.S. government trying to seize the moral high ground while biding its time for the right moment to launch another unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation.
A U.S. soldier in Afghanistan. Thousands of American servicemen will bear the heavy spiritual and psychological burden of having participated and killed innocent people in a fraudulent and criminal war. Why are we really fighting this war in Central Asia?
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
Galatians 6:7
For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright, who art as black as hell, as dark as night.
William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
We are never deceived; we deceive ourselves.
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe (1749-1832)
Nine years ago this week Larry Silverstein and his partner, the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, closed the deal on the 99-year lease of the World Trade Center. Silverstein and Lowy, devoted agents of the state of Israel and its Zionist fund-raising organizations in New York, immediately had their leased WTC property and future rental earnings insured against a terror attack exactly like that which occurred only seven weeks later. Having obtained the lease with borrowed funds, Silverstein promptly raised rents forty percent.
Unlike the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein actually owned WTC 7, the 47-story building that fell straight down into it’s footprint at about 5:25 p.m. on 9-11, in what was clearly a controlled demolition. All three towers demolished on 9-11 were under Silverstein’s control and although he openly admitted on camera that he had decided to “pull” WTC 7, his revealing comments have never been investigated by the authorities of New York City or the federal government.
Whoever placed the super-thermite and other explosive charges in the Twin Towers probably did so during the seven weeks before 9-11 that Silverstein controlled access to the towers. Apart from all the other questions, Silverstein has never been held to account for the fact that the escape doors to the roof of both towers had been locked.
Why were rooftop evacuations not attempted?
Larry Silverstein had control of all three towers that were demolished on 9-11. The explosive demolition of his three buildings made him a billionaire. Under the Rothschild Zionist crimocracy that controls New York City and the United States, Silverstein has been richly rewarded for his role in terrorism and mass murder – rather than investigated and punished.
In the following video Silverstein comments on his decision to “pull” WTC 7:
…
…
In the following video 9-11 truth activists shame Silverstein. This is what Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, and every other criminal involved in the 9-11 cover-up should get from the public.
…
…
While Larry Silverstein is certainly one of the key players in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, it is unlikely that he is one of the high-level architects of the master plan behind the terror atrocity. He is more likely to be a high-level sayan, a devoted Zionist Jew and “useful idiot”, who carried out an essential function in a large and complex operation. The master plan behind the “false-flag” terrorism of 9-11 was to deceive the U.S. government and western nations into occupying Afghanistan and waging an open-ended “War on Terror” against those Middle Eastern nations that resist the hegemony of the Rothschild-funded Zionist state of Israel. Ehud Barak, the current defense minister of Israel, was the first person to call for a U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, something he did shortly after the towers were demolished on the Rothschild-controlled BBC World television network.
“There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control.”
- Professor Steven E. Jones on KUER (Salt Lake City’s NPR affiliate), September 5, 2006
I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England. I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians.
- Letter to Bollyn.com, April 2010
The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is more than 1 trillion U.S. dollars.
See – http://costofwar.com/
The war in Afghanistan has already cost U.S. taxpayers more than 286 thousand million (billion) dollars, while the war in Iraq has burned up some 736 thousand million (billion) dollars. One out of five children in the USA live in poverty and tens of millions are unable to afford health care. The debt of the United States is so large that all the money taken in by the collection of income tax is not enough to pay the interest on that debt. All of that money from that debt and spent on the disastrous wars has been borrowed, i.e. created by debt to commercial banks like those owned by the house of Rothschild, which has a two-hundred year history of formenting war for profit. The Rothschild group is deeply engaged in gold, diamond, and gas and oil mining operations worldwide. Afghanistan is an extremely wealthy nation in terms of mineral resources and it also occupies a crucial location between the Mossad-controlled gas fields of Turkmenistan and the lucrative markets for that gas in India and China. The Rothchild family of London and Paris was the main financier and driving force behind the creation of the state of Israel, although most of the family continues to live in its mansions in Europe. An Israeli member of the family, Major General Danny Rothschild, runs the policy and strategy unit at the Mossad think tank/school known as the Inter-Disciplinary Center (IDC) in Herzliya near Tel Aviv.
As the recent disclosure of some 91,000 reports from the war in Afghanistan reveals, the war is far more brutal and criminal than most Americans thought. These disturbing reports were published on WikiLeaks on the same day that Silverstein obtained the WTC lease – nine years after.
The war in Afghanistan is a criminal war and occupation because it is based on the lies that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida, supposedly based in Afghanistan, carried out the terrorism of 9-11. This criminal deceit continues, like a tug-of-war, between those who are part of the deception and those who are fighting for the truth of what really happened on 9-11.
President Barack Obama is waging the war in Afghanistan because, he says, the terrorism of 9-11 came from there. The Obama administration, however, refuses to discuss the crucial discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, which reveals that an advanced explosive coating made using nanotechnology was used to pulverize the concrete floors of the Twin Towers. The same officials who support the criminal deception about what happened on 9-11 have used these lies to pull the United States and its allies into the criminal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The former Danish prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, now Secretary General of NATO, for example, wrote an editorial entitled “Moving On in Afghanistan”, which was published internationally by the New York Times on July 19, 2010. Rasmussen stressed the false connection between the war in Afghanistan and 9-11:
After the tragedy of 9/11, indifference was no longer an option. Engagement was our only choice. Leaving Afghanistan to its own devices would have spelled more instability there, and more terrorist attacks worldwide…Our objective is clear: to ensure that Afghanistan does not again become a safe haven for terrorism.
In the tug-of-war over the truth of 9-11, Rasmussen, Obama, and Clinton are really just “the people in between”, pulling as they are told to do by those who pay them. They are certainly not the masters of the nine-year-old deception about 9-11, which raises the question, “Who is really behind the deception?”
In my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World, I explain the Israeli and Zionist role in the false-flag terror atrocity. While Israeli terrorists like Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon, and Ehud Olmert were evidently involved in the terror attacks there must be an even higher master behind them, one which has complete control over the U.S. and British governments and mass media. The ultimate mastermind of 9-11must also have control over Israeli politicians and their military intelligence, as well as the sprawling Zionist Masonic network headed by the B’nai B’rith. Audacious as the Israeli Mossad is, it would not attack New York City and kill thousands of Americans if it did not have complete backing from the “international banking cartel” that controls the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve System, and the U.S. White House and Congress. There is only one entity that has such power and control – the House of Rothschild. Two steps removed perhaps, but connected to all culprits of the 9-11 atrocity and the nine-year cover-up.
Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II – the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London (shown above) described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime. It was only then that Germany struck back in response. Thus, if truth be told, it was the worldwide Jewish leadership – not the Third Reich – that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War. Prominent New York attorney Samuel Untermyer (above right) was one of the leading agitators in the war against Germany, describing the Jewish campaign as nothing less than a “holy war.”
Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on the “New Germany” at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler regime.
The war by the international Jewish leadership on Germany not only sparked definite reprisals by the German government but also set the stage for a little-known economic and political alliance between the Hitler government and the leaders of the Zionist movement who hoped that the tension between the Germans and the Jews would lead to massive emigration to Palestine. In short, the result was a tactical alliance between the Nazis and the founders of the modern-day state of Israel – a fact that many today would prefer be forgotten.
To this day, it is generally (although incorrectly) believed that when Adolf Hitler was appointed German chancellor in January of 1933, the German government began policies to suppress the Jews of Germany, including rounding up of Jews and putting them in concentration camps and launching campaigns of terror and violence against the domestic Jewish population.
While there were sporadic eruptions of violence against Jews in Germany after Hitler came to power, this was not officially sanctioned or encouraged. And the truth is that anti-Jewish sentiments in Germany (or elsewhere in Europe) were actually nothing new. As all Jewish historians attest with much fervor, anti-Semitic uprisings of various degrees had been ever-present in European history.
In any case, in early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany, nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself. That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.
Even Germany’s Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested the suggestion (made by some Jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new government was deliberately provoking anti-Jewish uprisings.
The Verein issued a statement that “the responsible government authorities [i.e. the Hitler regime] are unaware of the threatening situation,” saying, “we do not believe our German fellow citizens will let themselves be carried away into committing excesses against the Jews.”
Despite this, Jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler government.
On March 12, 1933 the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods. In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York’s City Hall as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout shops and businesses in New York City.
According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the Jews had already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected government. The headline read “Judea Declares War on Germany – Jews of All the World Unite – Boycott of German Goods – Mass Demonstrations.” The article described a forthcoming “holy war” and went on to implore Jews everywhere to boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German economic interests. According to the Express:
The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers.
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people.
The Express said that Germany was “now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry…. In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade.”
The article said “worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest demonstrations,” and reported that “the old and reunited nation of Israel gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old battle against its persecutors.”
This truly could be described as “the first shot fired in the Second World War.”
In a similar vein, the Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:
The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses… by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed.
The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all time…. In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the strength and might we have at our disposal.
However, note well that the Zionist Association of Germany put out a telegram on the 26th of March rejecting many of the allegations made against the National Socialists as “propaganda,” “mendacious” and “sensational.”
In fact, the Zionist faction had every reason to ensure the permanence of National Socialist ideology in Germany. Klaus Polkehn, writing in the Journal of Palestine StudiesJPS v. 3/4, spring/summer 1976), claims that the moderate attitude of the Zionists was due to their vested interest in seeing the financial victory of National Socialism to force immigration to Palestine. This little-known factor would ultimately come to play a pivotal part in the relationship between Nazi Germany and the Jews. (“The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany, 1933-1941″;
In the meantime, though, German Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath complained of the “vilification campaign” and said:
As concerns Jews, I can only say that their propagandists abroad are rendering their co-religionists in Germany no service by giving the German public, through their distorted and untruthful news about persecution and torture of Jews, the impression that they actually halt at nothing, not even at lies and calumny, to fight the present German government.
The fledgling Hitler government itself was clearly trying to contain the growing tension – both within Germany and without. In the United States, even U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull wired Rabbi Stephen Wise of the American Jewish Congress and urged caution:
Whereas there was for a short time considerable physical mistreatment of Jews, this phase may be considered virtually terminated…. A stabilization appears to have been reached in the field of personal mistreatment…. I feel hopeful that the situation which has caused such widespread concern throughout this country will soon revert to normal.
This New York Daily News front page headline hailed the massive anti-German protest rally held in Madison Square Garden on March 27, 1933. Despite efforts by the German government to alleviate tensions and prevent the escalation of name-calling and threats by the international Jewish leadership, the rally was held as scheduled. Similar rallies and protest marches were also being held in other cities during the same time frame. The intensity of the Jewish campaign against Germany was such that the Hitler government vowed that if the campaign did not stop, there would be a one-day boycott in Germany of Jewish-owned stores. Despite this, the hate campaign continued, forcing Germany to take defensive measures that created a situation wherein the Jews of Germany became increasingly marginalized. The truth about the Jewish war on Germany has been suppressed by most histories of the period.
Despite all this, the leaders of the Jewish community refused to relent. On March 27 there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden, in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is that “the New Germany” was declared to be an enemy of Jewish interests and thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to boycott Jewish goods.
It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be stopped. Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a speech on March 28 – four days after the original Jewish declaration of war – saying:
Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.
The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there….
Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing once before in 1914.
Thus, the fact – one conveniently left out of nearly all history on the subject – is that Hitler’s March 28, 1933 boycott order was in direct response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish leadership just four days earlier. Today, Hitler’s boycott order is described as a naked act of aggression, yet the full circumstances leading up to his order are seldom described in even the most ponderous and detailed histories of “the Holocaust”.
Not even Saul Friedlander in his otherwise comprehensive overview of German policy, Nazi Germany and the Jews, mentions the fact that the Jewish declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler’s speech of March 28, 1933. Discerning readers would be wise to ask why Friedlander felt this item of history so irrelevant.
The simple fact is that it was organized Jewry as a political entity – and not even the German Jewish community per se – that actually initiated the first shot in the war with Germany.
Germany’s response was a defensive – not an offensive – measure. Were that fact widely known today, it would cast new light on the subsequent events that ultimately led to the world-wide conflagration that followed.
To understand Hitler’s reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In 1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the resolve of Germany’s enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish military high command.
The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany demilitarized and vulnerable.
The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the boycott, German exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement – The Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine, New York, 1984).
Placard text: “Germans! Defend yourselves! Don’t shop at Jewish stores!” Photo not part of original TBR article – added by The Scriptorium.
The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.
Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.
Untermyer’s inflammatory oratory called for a “sacred war” against Germany, making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to “exterminate the Jews.” He said (in part):
…Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.
We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of this incredible outrage….
Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against the… slaughter, starvation and annihilation… fiendish torture, cruelty and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women and children….
When the tale is told… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people…
The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell….
…What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.
…We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand….
Untermyer then proceeded to provide his listeners with a wholly fraudulent history of the circumstances of the German boycott and how it originated. He also proclaimed that the Germans were bent on a plan to “exterminate the Jews”:
The Hitler regime originated and are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott to exterminate the Jews by placarding Jewish shops, warning Germans against dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them through the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the learned professions in which many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps and starving and torturing them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.
Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by declaring that with the support of “Christian friends… we will drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism….”
The Biggest Secret of WWII? Why Germany Began Rounding Up Jews
and Deporting Them to the East
Why did the Germans begin rounding up the Jews and interning them in the concentration camps to begin with? Contrary to popular myth, the Jews remained “free” inside Germany – albeit subject to laws which did restrict certain of their privileges – prior to the outbreak of World War II.
Yet, the other little-known fact is that just before the war began, the leadership of the world Jewish community formally declared war on Germany – above and beyond the ongoing six-year-long economic boycott launched by the worldwide Jewish community when the Nazi Party came to power in 1933.
As a consequence of the formal declaration of war, the German authorities thus deemed Jews to be potential enemy agents.
Here’s the story behind the story: Chaim Weizmann (above), president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6, 1939 that: I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany].
We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.
[Emphasis in red added by The Scriptorium.]
That his allegations against Germany were made long before even Jewish historians today claim there were any gas chambers or even a plan to “exterminate” the Jews, displays the nature of the propaganda campaign confronting Germany.
However, during this same period there were some unusual developments at work: The spring of 1933 also witnessed the beginning of a period of private cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in Germany and Palestine (and actually worldwide) to increase the flow of German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.
The modern-day supporters of Zionist Israel and many historians have succeeded in keeping this Nazi-Zionist pact a secret to the general public for decades and while most Americans have no concept of the possibility that there could have been outright collaboration between the Nazi leadership and the founders of what became the state of Israel, the truth has begun to emerge.
Dissident Jewish writer Lenni Brennar’s Zionism In the Age of the Dictators, published by a small press and not given the publicity it deserves by the so-called “mainstream” media (which is otherwise obsessed with the Holocaust era), was perhaps the first major endeavor in this realm.
In response to Brennar and others, the Zionist reaction has usually consisted of declarations that their collaboration with Nazi Germany was undertaken solely to save the lives of Jews. But the collaboration was all the more remarkable because it took place at a time when many Jews and Jewish organizations demanded a boycott of Germany.
To the Zionist leaders, Hitler’s assumption of power held out the possibility of a flow of immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.
For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to mention the Israelis themselves) about “the Holocaust”, they neglect to mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possible – in cooperation with German National Socialism – was part of the plan.
This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German Jewry to Palestine.
According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer. Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.
Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984), stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due to the Zionist movement’s influence within Nazi Germany a Jew’s best chance of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words, the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital could only to go Palestine.
Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went to the Levant.
The primary difficulty with the Transfer Agreement (or even the idea of such an agreement) was that the English [!!!; Scriptorium] were demanding, as a condition of immigration, that each immigrant pay 1,000 pounds sterling upon arrival in Haifa or elsewhere. The difficulty was that such hard currency was nearly impossible to come by in a cash-strapped and radically inflationary Germany. This was the main idea behind the final Transfer Agreement. Laqueur writes:
Note to readers of this article who can also read German: a booklet discussing the emigration of Jews from Third Reich Germany, and the Transfer Agreement that facilitated their emigration, may be found here!
A large German bank would freeze funds paid in by immigrants in blocked accounts for German exporters, while a bank in Palestine would control the sale of German goods to Palestine, thereby providing the immigrants with the necessary foreign currency on the spot. Sam Cohen, co-owner of Hanoaiah Ltd. and initiator of the transfer endeavors, was however subjected to long-lasting objections from his own people and finally had to concede that such a transfer agreement could only be concluded on a much higher level with a bank of its own rather than that of a private company. The renowned Anglo-Palestine Bank in London would be included in this transfer deal and create a trust company for [this] purpose.
Of course, this is of major historical importance in dealing with the relationship between Zionism and National Socialism in Germany in the 1930s. The relationship was not one merely of mutual interest and political favoritism on the part of Hitler, but a close financial relationship with German banking families and financial institutions as well. Black writes:
It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott. Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded, stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany.
Thus one sees a radical fissure in world Jewry around 1933 and beyond. There were, first, the non-Zionist Jews (specifically the World Jewish Congress founded in 1933), who, on the one hand, demanded the boycott and eventual destruction of Germany. Black notes that many of these people were not just in New York and Amsterdam, but a major source for this also came from Palestine proper.
On the other hand, one can see the judicious use of such feelings by the Zionists for the sake of eventual resettlement in Palestine. In other words, it can be said (and Black does hint at this) that Zionism believed that, since Jews would be moving to the Levant, capital flight would be necessary for any new economy to function.
The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the flow of Jewish capital out of the country.
It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that “The Zionists became motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency.” In other words, the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry convincing the world’s Jews that immigration was the only escape.
The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small minority of German Jews in 1933.
On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations of Germany’s “cruelties” to the world’s Jews while at the same time demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the boycott.
For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it “proved” to many Jews that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.
For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews (to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy (for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the fraud continues.
It isn’t abortion. It isn’t illegal immigration. No, it isn’t sex either. No, it isn’t health problems, it isn’t personal finance and it isn’t marriage or anything like that. It’s not crime, fraud, war or racism. It isn’t 9/11 and it isn’t Kennedy’s death. It also isn’t Martin Luther Kings death. None of those things. We, as adults, are allowed to ask questions about all of them. Well, maybe not 9/11 but we still discuss it openly.
We are not allowed to question the Holocaust and the 6 million Jews that were killed. NO Questions allowed. WE know the facts.
OR do we?
I was born a Jew. An Ashkenazi Jew, a Khazar. I had, as a child, very elderly relatives with numbers tattooed on their upper arms. A dozen of them. So I have EVERY RIGHT to ask questions and of course I was certain that I would confirm everything I had been taught in my very American schooling. I was wrong. I confirmed NOTHING and found a wealth of evidence that discredits the mainstream perspective so much so that it appears that at this point a Holocaust as it’s described historically just NEVER happened.
I know, I can hear you, call me a Holocaust denier. It’s OK. I can handle it. I prefer exhaustive research and the truth as opposed to living a lie. I also realize it’s difficult, virtually impossible, to admit to oneself that you may have been deceived on such a grand scale. It hurts, quite frankly. I know.
So, rather then go into great detail I’m going to leave it to you to investigate this yourself by providing many links described below. But before I do that I want to point out a few things for everyone, especially for those that may have visited Auschwitz-Birkenau, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, or Treblinka.
The evidence I have used and examined is from trial testimony, photographs, investigations by Jewish authors and testimony from military personnel and civilians that were there. This information is NOT easy to find because no one wants you to find it but thanks to the internet it is available.
Everything below is TRUE. Here is just a SMALL portion of what I’ve found. A VERY SMALL PORTION.
There was NEVER an order from Hitler to exterminate the Jews.
World Jewry declared war on Hitler well before there were any wars and they did this publicly in Newspapers and with Boycotts and Rallies to prevent people globally from buying anything made in Germany. This was done while the US was still supporting German commerce and business through our banks and financial institutions. The Zionists DID NOT support this Boycott.
Auschwitz had a large outdoor swimming pool INSIDE the prisoners quarters, the prisoners played soccer, put on shows in the theater and had stores of various types. There was even a brothel located INSIDE the prisoners quarters, inside the fenced in housing area. The prisoners were afforded a half hour for lunch and worked 8 hours each day. They bought jellies, jams, stamps, cards and paper at a kanteen.
During the war prisoners in concentration camps received 1700 calories a day in rations or meals, far greater then the average 700 calories a day the German people were able to get. Food was scarce but these prison camps weren’t Concentration Camps, they were Work Camps and the German War Machine required a huge wealth of human labor and they had every reason to preserve life.
To prevent disease the Germans fumigated the shoes, bedding, mattresses and clothing of prisoners regularly with Zyclon-B, a cyanide gas used in Britain and America for the very same purpose.
It was only towards the end of the war that food became scarce and that’s why we’ve all seen pictures of very skinny emaciated prisoners. Also towards the end of the war prisoners were not cared for quite as well and diseases began to spread as a result of fleas and other infestations.
The pictures we’ve all seen of the many bodies piled in makeshift gullies are prisoners that died of disease and hunger, not prisoners that were tortured or murdered. These bodies piled up faster then they could be disposed of and they were routinely placed in ditches and burned to prevent the spread of Typhus and other communicable diseases.
The entire theme of soap, lampshades and other things “made from Jewish prisoners” was proven to be a totally fabricated story and none of this is true. It just never happened.
The plaque on display at the Auschwitz camp until 1989 noted “4 million” victims. The plaque currently on display at Auschwitz (2002) was suddenly reduced and the number of victims is now 1.5 million – a casual reduction in the number of deaths by 2.5 million which never appeared in the American “free press.”
What about the population of Jews? Per World Almanac figures, it INCREASED by 584,549 between 1941 and 1948. So, this being the case, where did the 6,000,000 dead go?
All world almanacs show that during WWII the number of Jews in Europe remained flat, but Britannica Book of the Year reports that the number of Jews in the world increased by 600,000, or 4%. How could 6 million Jews (40% of all Jews and 64% of those in Europe) have died in the Holocaust if their worldwide population increased by 4%?
Each year for decades, tens of thousands of visitors to Auschwitz have been shown an execution “gas chamber” in the main camp, supposedly in its “original state.” In January 1995 the prestigious French weekly magazine L’Express acknowledged that “everything” about this “gas chamber” is “false,” and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction but the American media said nothing about this.
Many thousands of secret German wartime documents dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated after the war by the Allies. But not a single one refers to a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the familiar Auschwitz extermination story cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
It is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young, sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.
But the evidence shows otherwise. In fact, a very high percentage of the Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4, 1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of 25,000 Jews held in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates — some 21,500, or about 86 percent — were unable to work.
This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on “security measures in Auschwitz” by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom “approximately 15,000 are unable to work.”
The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment to other camps. That is the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of Northwestern University, who also says that this was an important reason for the unusually high death rate there.
Jewish scholar Arno Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University, acknowledges in his 1988 book about the “final solution” that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other “natural” causes than were executed.
THERE IS SO MUCH MORE!
Now, there is A LOT of data to read and several videos to watch that have led me to these conclusions so if you intend to argue with me I would suggest you examine the very same data that I have. Personally, I believe we all owe it to ourselves to do so, rather then just accept a part of history that may not be true. How many of you know that George Washington NEVER chopped down a Cherry Tree? There are MANY episodes throughout history that we take for granted because, well just because we do. And there are many instances where these episodes were conjured up as propaganda, took on a life of their own and became history when in fact they are not. If we are to hold an opinion that something happened as severe as the Holocaust are we not fully responsible to investigate the data to be sure it’s true?
…
…
Here are just a few of my references:
Pages From The Auschwitz Death Registry Volumes
Long-Hidden Death Certificates Discredit Extermination Claims
Now, I am not saying that Jews weren’t killed, they were.
I’m saying that the Holocaust didn’t happen the way I’ve been taught, that most of the deaths were from diseases and starvation because allied bombing prevented commerce and food was severely rationed. I’m saying that towards the end of the war bodies piled up far more quickly then they could be disposed of and that they were hurriedly disposed of in ditches and burned to prevent the further spread of disease. I’m saying that I don’t like being lied to and this myth has been used to extract millions of dollars from Western and European Countries.
I’m saying the truth comes with a burden and that it’s as heartbreaking as the lies, maybe more so. There are many more links. I’ll leave it to you, the reader, to find them.
The truth is NOT elusive, it’s just not discussed.
Republicans in the US House of Representatives have introduced a measure that would green-light a possible Israeli bombing campaign against Iran.
Resolution 1553 provides explicit support for military strikes against Iran, stating that Congress backs Israel’s use of ‘all means necessary’ against Iran, “including the use of military force,” BBC Persian reported.
The introduction of the measure coincides with a pattern of renewed calls for military strikes that have escalated since President Obama signed Congressional Iran sanctions into law.
Neoconservatives who were instrumental in orchestrating the Iraq War, such as Bill Kristol and Reuel Marc Gerecht, have led the stepped up calls for military action.
Hawkish former Bush administration official John Bolton recently laid out the game plan to prod Israel into attacking Iran, arguing that outsiders can “create broad support” for a strike by framing it as an issue of Israel’s right to self-defense.
Supporters for military strikes, Bolton says, should “defend the specific tactic of pre-emptive attacks” against Iran.
He said that Congress can ‘make it clear’ that it supports such strikes and that ‘having visible congressional support in place at the outset will reassure’ Israel.
In spite of support from the neocons, top US military leaders have warned of the many dangers of military strikes against Iran.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has argued “Another war in the Middle East is the last thing we need. In fact, I believe it would be disastrous on a number of levels.”
Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has expressed his own serious reservations about an attack on Iran.
The US, which is already providing billions of dollars worth of arms to Israel every year, describes Tel Aviv’s military edge in the region as being in America’s interest.
The webs of deception and debt are controlled by an evil spider that is seldom seen.
“There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.”
- U.S. President John Adams
“Britain is the slave of an international financial bloc.”
- British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, June 20, 1934
“If the American people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.” - U.S. President Andrew Jackson, 1829
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or so dependent upon its favors that there will be no opposition from that class while, on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending…will bear its burdens without complaint.” - The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863
“There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control.”
- Professor Steven E. Jones on KUER (Salt Lake City‘s NPR affiliate), September 5, 2006
I have recently been listed in something called the Encyclopedia of American Loons, which is being put together (in alphabetical order) by Ryan Nathaniel Lake, a 33-year-old post-graduate student of philosophy at the University of Miami. Lake, originally from Muskegon, Michigan, lives in Miami Beach and teaches on the virtual college website of Miami Dade College.
The Pacific Loon is a strong swimmer
By definition, a loon is one of the fish-eating, diving birds of the genus Gavia of northern regions, but “loon” is also used informally to mean a person who “is crazy or deranged”, which is apparently how Ryan Lake views me. At the bottom of my entry he provides this “diagnosis”.
Diagnosis: Complete loon and master at interpreting the fact that anyone disagrees with him, for whatever reason, as evidence for the truth of his conspiracy theories. Specific impact uncertain, but his views are apparently relatively widespread and must be considered dangerous.
Dangerous to whom? Exactly to whom are my views dangerous? To the American people who are suffering under a mountain of debt and whose loved ones are made to fight an utterly fraudulent war in Afghanistan and Iraq? My views about what happened on 9-11 are based on documented facts and evidence that are in the public domain. The evidence from 9-11, such as the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, is certainly dangerous to the Zionist criminals who carried out the false-flag terror attacks and the Elders of Zion from the House of Rothschild who control them, because it liberates us from their web of deception about what really happened – and why.
A large amount of super-thermite was found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center. This extremely powerful explosive coating was made using nanotechnology and evidently applied to the floor pans of the Twin Towers. This scientific evidence exposes the government and media explanation of 9-11 as nothing but a pack of lies. Who profits from America’s extremely costly wars in the Middle East? Ask the Rothschild Debt Spider.
Although he is clearly hostile to my thesis, Lake does a fair job summing it up:
9-11 was the product of a Zionist conspiracy (in particular organized by the Rothschild family) – the Zionist conspiracy that controls the US government and media. They have also infiltrated the Senate, as shown by Bollyn’s razor-sharp and fearless investigations, e.g. “Arlen Specter – The Elder of Zion in the U.S. Senate”. Henry Kissinger is at the top of the conspiracy, and “still a key player in the crimocracy as seen by the conspicuous fact that he was sent by the new Obama administration to meet with the leadership of Russia, although the nominal Secretary of State was Hillary Clinton.” I guess you can’t argue with evidence like that.
SLAYING THE DEBT SPIDER
The second part of “The Coming American Revolution” will be my next article. It may be titled “Slaying the Spider” because it will deal with identifying the spider which has woven the web of deception and debt in which we find ourselves and our nation(s) trapped.
The American people are clearly enraged by the Rothschild criminal “banksters” and their corruption of the government and media monopoly. Even the most conservative Encyclopedia Britannica article on the Rothschild family describes it as a criminal enterprise.
Americans are deeply enraged and the revolutionary zeal is clearly palpable. The U.S. population was against the bail-out of Zionist banksters 1,000 to 1, but public opinion didn’t slow down the trillion dollar transfer of wealth to the criminals for one minute. How do we wage a revolution if we don’t even know who we are fighting against? We need to know exactly who the enemy is before we can take effective action of any kind.
Our American republic is in an extreme debt crisis that has been caused by the Rothschild bankers who control the world by controlling the money supply and keeping the governments of the world in deep debt. Ellen Hodgson Brown, the author of an excellent book entitled The Web of Debt, says this about the coming revolution in the chapter “Stepping from Scarcity into Abundance”:
Wars, competition and strife are the inevitable results of this scarcity-driven system. The obvious solution is to eliminate the parasitic banking scheme that is feeding on the world’s prosperity. But how? The Witches of Wall Street are not likely to release their vice-like grip without some sort of revolution, and a violent revolution would probably fail, because the world’s most feared military machine is already in the hands of the money cartel. Violent revolution would just furnish them with an excuse to test their equipment.
I agree with Ellen Brown, who refers to the familiar Wizard of Oz allegory throughout her most readable work, that it is the Debt Spider that must be vanquished. Our nation(s) and our lives are stuck fast in a very sticky web of debt while our minds are trapped tightly in the controlled-media web of deception. These webs both belong to a spider that remains out of sight. Although we can see those who are caught in the web, we don’t see the spider.
In the allegorical Wizard of Oz, the courageous Lion killed the great spider, who symbolizes the head of the international banking cartel: “With one blow of his heavy paw, all armed with sharp claws, he knocked the spider’s head from its body.”
To free ourselves from the ocean of debt that is drowning our nation and killing prosperity we must kill the Debt Spider. How is the Rothschild debt spider to be slain in the real world?
Hans Schicht, author of “The Death of Banking and Macro Politics”, explains how:
If prime ministers and presidents would only be blessed with the most basic knowledge of the perversity of banking, they would not go onto their knees to the Central Banker and ask His Highness for loans…With a little bit of brains they would expropriate all banking institutions.
A political cartoon from 1848 shows the rulers and people of Europe begging a Rothschild for loans. Rothschild control over politics and war has increased immensely in the century and a half since this drawing was made. Apart from controlling the governments and mass media of powerful nations, such as Britain and the United States, the Rothschilds have a nation they can call their own – the Zionist state of Israel.
The first banking institution that needs to be nationalized is the Federal Reserve System. To return the control over the supply and value of money to the U.S. government is the only realistic solution to the debt crisis.
As financial writer John Hoefle wrote:
This is not an academic question, as the Fed is actively involved in looting the American population for the benefit of giant U.S. and global financial institutions, and the global casino. Few Americans have any idea the extent to which the Fed and its system reach into their pockets on a daily basis, and the extent to which their standard of living has been eroded by the financier-led deindustrialization of the United States.
VULTURE CAPITALISM
Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee filed a Petition for Articles of Impeachment against the Federal Reserve Board in 1934. He told Congress:
This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
The struggle between the people of the United States and the House of Rothschild is older than the American republic. The Rothschild banking cartel and its desire to control the money supply was actually behind the American Revolution of 1776, the War of 1812, and the Civil War. This same international banking cartel is certainly behind the current debt crisis and the costly wars in the Middle East, which are the root causes of the revolutionary fervor in America today. The coming revolution is not against the U.S. government per se but should be targeted against the specific agent which has corrupted our government. As Ellen Brown says, “What has allowed government to become corrupted today is that it is actually run by the money cartel.”
William Jennings Bryan, the Democratic candidate for the presidency in 1896, won the nomination with his famous “Cross of Gold” speech, in which he aimed his criticism squarely at the international banking cartel. Bryan explained the problem – and the solution – in plain English:
I stand with Jefferson…and tell them, as he did, that the issue of money is a function of the government and that the banks should go out of the governing business...when we have restored the money of the Constitution, all other necessary reforms will be possible, and…until that is done there is no reform that can be accomplished.
“They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at it’s headquarters, Marine Corps and I made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period.”
“And the Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they’re done.”
Needless to say, these statements from a man with Dr. Sabrosky’s credentials galvanized the 9/11 truth movement.In this rare interview, he discusses the blockade of Gaza.
An Israeli man accused of being involved in the assassination of a Hamas commander in Dubai has appealed a Polish court’s decision to extradite him to Germany. Last month, Uri Brodsky was captured in Warsaw and earlier this month Warsaw’s district court ordered him to be extradited to Germany.
The extradition ruling comes after Berlin said it wanted Brodsky for alleged spying and obtaining a German passport allegedly used in the killing of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in a Dubai hotel in January.
Brodsky’s lawyer, Krzysztof Stepinski, said on Monday that he filed an appeal to the decision in a bid to lift the extradition order and have him returned to Israel, the Associated Press reported.
The lawyer noted that a court would hear the appeal on August 5.
Dubai police have implicated Israeli agents in the killing, releasing evidence which shows the Mossad-linked assassins used forged foreign passports.
On June 4, Polish authorities arrested a man with the name “Uri Brodsky” on his passport at the Warsaw airport.
On Thursday, European investigators, under the condition of anonymity, called Brodsky a high-level and experienced “facilitator” for the Mossad in Europe.
The report states that they do not believe Brodsky is the man’s real name and his identity remains at question.
The investigators said that the individual, known as ‘Brodsky’ had used fraudulent documents to obtain a German passport in the name of “Michael Bodenheimer.”
Bodenheimer is one of those suspected of assassinating Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a senior Hamas official, in Dubai on January 19.
After the mysterious death of al-Mabhouh in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates published photos and identifying information on 26 members of the hit team, who had reportedly tracked and killed the Hamas member.
Evidence also indicates that Brodsky was involved in logistics, providing paperwork, safe houses and other backup for the execution squad.
The team used fake German, French, British, Irish and Australian passports.
In the last few days, Britain, Australia and Ireland have expelled Israel’s diplomats in connection with the case.
Israel has neither confirmed nor denied its involvement in the assassination.
Many of the world’s intelligence organizations consider the case to have been a major Mossad fiasco, the report says.
Analysts say that Israel had probably initially planned to drug and kidnap al-Mabhouh in order to trade him for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, who had been captured by Hamas. It is believed, however, that the team mistakenly gave al-Mabhouh an overdose, which killed him.
The terror team was comprised of twelve British, six Irish, four French, three Australian and a German passport holder.
Brodsky is believed to be one of the spy agency’s key fixers in Europe who obtained the false German passport for at least one of the assassins.
The Tel Aviv regime had called on Poland to send Brodsky home rather than handing him over to Germany.
“If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”
- U.S. President Andrew Jackson, 1829
The Obama-Hitler-Lenin billboard of the North Iowa Tea Party was papered over one day after it was posted. Did it get too close to the truth?
A controversial billboard comparing the “change” of U.S. President Barack Obama with Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin raised a few eyebrows before it was papered over one day after it appeared in Mason City, Iowa. The billboard suggests that Obama is a radical socialist leader similar to Hitler and Lenin. This is, in fact, a true comparison, which is probably why it was papered over so quickly. Obama, Hitler, and Lenin were all initially financed by Rothschild money. If we look at the historical record, we can clearly see that all three leaders were originally puppets of the House of Rothschild.
LENIN
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders…
- Winston Churchill, “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, Illustrated Sunday Herald, London, February 8, 1920
Leon Trotsky was given $20 million in Jacob Schiff gold to help finance the revolution, which was deposited in a Warburg bank, then transferred to the Nya Banken (The New Bank) in Stockholm, Sweden. According to the Knickerbocker Column in the New York Journal American on February 3, 1949: “Today it is estimated by Jacob’s grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia.”
In October, 1917 when the Revolution started, Lenin, who was in Switzerland, negotiated with the German High Command with the help of Max Warburg (head of the Rothschild-affiliated Warburg bank in Frankfurt) to allow him, his wife, and 32 other Bolsheviks to travel across Germany to Sweden, where he was to pick up the money being held for him in the Swedish bank, then go on to Petrograd. He promised to make peace with Germany if he was able to overthrow the new Russian government.
He was put in a sealed railway car with over $5 million in gold from the German government and upon reaching Petrograd, was joined by Stalin and Trotsky. He told the people that he could no longer work within the government to effect change, that they had to strike immediately in force to end the war, and end the hunger conditions of the peasants. His war cry was: “All power to the Soviets!”
The Rothschilds, through Milner, planned the Russian Revolution, and along with Schiff (who gave $20 million), Sir George Buchanan, the Warburgs, the Rockefellers, the partners of J.P. Morgan (who gave at least $1 million), Olaf Aschberg (of the New Bank of Stockholm, Sweden), the Rhine Westphalian Syndicate, a financier named Jovotovsky (whose daughter later married Leon Trotsky), William Boyce Thompson (a director of Chase National Bank who contributed $1 million), and Albert H. Wiggin (President of Chase National Bank), helped finance it.
HITLER
Heny Makow has written several in-depth articles on the Rothschild connections to the socialist movements in Russia and Germany. Makow asks, “Why would the [Rothschild] financial elite also want to destroy Russia, which they created?”
The transcript of the 1938 NKVD interrogation of C.G. Rakowsky (a.k.a Chaim Rakeover) provides the answer. Rakowsky was an intimate of Trotsky’s and former Soviet ambassador to Paris.
Rothschild’s agent Leon Trotsky was supposed to succeed Lenin but got sick at the critical moment. Stalin was able to assume power and divert Russia from Rothschild control.
In order to control Stalin, international finance was forced to build up Hitler and the Nazi party. Rakowsky confirms that Jewish financiers backed the Nazis although Hitler was not aware of this.
“The ambassador Warburg presented himself under a false name and Hitler did not even guess his race… he also lied regarding whose representative he was… Our aim was to provoke a war and Hitler was war…[the Nazis] received…millions of dollars sent to it from Wall Street, and millions of Marks from German financiers through [Hjalmar] Schacht; [providing] the upkeep of the S.A and the S.S. and also the financing of the elections…”
Unfortunately for the bankers, Hitler also proved intractable. He started to print his own money!
“He took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the state… Are you capable of imagining what would have come …if it had infected a number of other states and brought about the creation of a period of autarchy [absolute rule, replacing that of the bankers]. If you can, then imagine its counterrevolutionary functions…”
Hitler had become a bigger threat than Stalin, who had not meddled with money. Rakovsky’s present mission was to convince Stalin to make a pact with Hitler and turn Hitler’s aggression against the West. The purpose was for Germany and the Western nations to exhaust each other before another front was opened in the East.
The “Revolutionary Movement” was an attempt by Meyer Rothschild and his allies to protect and extend this monopoly by establishing a totalitarian New World Order.
According to Rakovsky, “The Rothschilds were not the treasurers, but the chiefs of that first secret Communism…Marx and the highest chiefs of the First International … were controlled by Baron Lionel Rothschild, [1808-1878] whose revolutionary portrait was done by Disraeli the English Premier, who was also his creature, and has been left to us [in Disraeli's novel 'Coningsby.']“
Lionel’s son Nathaniel (1840-1915) needed to overthrow the Christian Romanoff Dynasty. Through his agents Jacob Schiff and the Warburg brothers, he financed the Japanese side in the Russo Japanese War, and an unsuccessful insurrection in Moscow in 1905. Then he instigated the First World War (Trotsky was behind the murder of Archduke Ferdinand) and financed the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. Rakovsky says he was personally involved in the transfer of funds in Stockholm.
The Jewish labour movement or “bund” was Rothschild’s instrument. The Bund’s “secret faction” infiltrated all the socialist parties in Russia and provided the leadership for the Russian Revolution. Alexander Kerensky, the Menshevik Prime Minister was a secret member.
Leon Trotsky was supposed to become the leader of the USSR. Trotsky, a Jew, married the daughter of one of Rothschild’s closest associates, banker Abram Zhivotovsky and became part of the “clan.”
Unfortunately “national” Communists like Lenin (one-quarter Jewish) got in the way. Lenin overruled Trotsky and made peace with Germany (Treaty of Brest Litovsk, 1918.) This was not the Rothschild’s plan.
World War One was supposed to end the way the Second World War did. Russia was supposed to overrun Germany in 1918 and assist local “revolutionaries” in establishing a “peoples’ republic.”
Trotsky was responsible for an attempt to assassinate Lenin in 1918 but Lenin survived. When Lenin had a stroke in 1922, Trotsky had Levin, Lenin’s Jewish doctor, finish him off.
At this critical moment, the unexpected happened. Trotsky got sick and Stalin was able to take power. At this crucial juncture, the Trotskyites pretended to support Stalin and infiltrated his regime in order to sabotage it…
OBAMA
President Obama was cultivated and created as a candidate since the early 1990s by Jewish capital to serve Zionist interests, something I have written a great deal about. It is remarkable that this controversial billboard appeared in Iowa, the same state where the dark horse candidate Obama came from behind to win – after the rigged caucus in which the caucus votes were tallied telephonically by Voxeo, a company connected to Israeli military intelligence.
The fact that Obama is the product of a network of wealthy Jewish financiers is certainly no secret to the Jews. This is the cover of the Chicago Jewish News of October 24, 2008.
A recent Israeli interview with President Obama shows his Zionist colors well:
YONIT LEVI: Now, I must ask you this, Mr. President, there are people in Israel who are anxious about you and who, you know, I’m quoting their sentiments, feel like you don’t have a special connection to Israel. How do you respond to that?
OBAMA: Well, it’s interesting. This is the thing that actually surfaced even before I was elected President, in some of the talk that was circulating within the Jewish American community. Ironically, I’ve got a Chief of Staff named Rahm Israel Emanuel. My top political advisor is somebody who is a descendent of Holocaust survivors. My closeness to the Jewish American community was probably what propelled me to the U.S. Senate. And my not just knowledge but sympathy and identification with the Jewish experience is rooted in part because of the historic connection between the African American freedom movement here in the United States and the civil rights efforts of Jewish Americans and some of the same impulses that led to the creation of Israel…
YONIT LEVI: So that fear, the tangible fear that some Israelis have that their best ally in the world might abandon them is —
OBAMA: Well, it’s pretty hard to square with the fact that not only have I in every speech that I’ve ever given talked about the unbreakable bond to Israel, not only did I describe that special relationship and condemn those who would try to drive a rift between us in Cairo in front of a Muslim audience, but if you look at our actions — and Prime Minister Netanyahu will confirm this, and even critics I think will have to confirm that the United States under my administration has provided more security assistance to Israel than any administration in history. And we’ve got greater security cooperation between our two countries than at any time in our history. And the single most important threat to Israel — Iran, and its potential possession of a nuclear weapon — has been my number one foreign policy priority over the course of the last 18 months.
So it’s hard to, I think, look at that track record and look at my public statements and in any way think that my passions for Israel’s survival, its security, and its people are in any way diminished.
Brother Kapner is one of our bravest: He was born jewish, yet he had the courage to renounce judaism. He is now a Christian, dedicated to exposing the zionists who carried out 9/11 and covertly control our country.
Please read English Transcript HERE
Bibi:…The Arabs are currently focusing on a war of terror and they think it will break us. The main thing, first of all, is to hit them. Not just one blow, but blows that are so painful that the price will be too heavy to be borne. The price is not too heavy to be borne, now. A broad attack on the Palestinian Authority. To bring them to the point of being afraid that everything is collapsing…
Woman: Wait a moment, but then the world will say “how come you’re conquering again?”
Netanyahu: the world won’t say a thing. The world will say we’re defending.
Woman: Aren’t you afraid of the world, Bibi?
Netanyahu: Especially today, with America. I know what America is. America is something that can easily be moved. Moved to the right direction.
Child: They say they’re for us, but, it’s like…
Netanyahu: They won’t get in our way. They won’t get in our way.
Child: On the other hand, if we do some something, then they…
Netanyahu: So let’s say they say something. So they said it! They said it! 80% of the Americans support us. It’s absurd. We have that kind of support and we say “what will we do with the…” Look. That administration [Clinton] was extremely pro-Palestinian. I wasn’t afraid to maneuver there. I was not afraid to clash with Clinton. I was not afraid to clash with the United Nations. I was paying the price anyway, I preferred to receive the value. Value for the price.
In the following segment, Bibi boasts about how he emptied the Oslo Accords of meaning by an interpretation that made a mockery of them:
Woman: The Oslo Accords are a disaster.
Netanyahu: Yes. You know that and I knew that…The people [nation] has to know…
What were the Oslo Accords? The Oslo Accords, which the Knesset signed, I was asked, before the elections: “Will you act according to them?” and I answered: “yes, subject to mutuality and limiting the retreats.” “But how do you intend to limit the retreats?” “I’ll give such interpretation to the Accords that will make it possible for me to stop this galloping to the ’67 [armistice] lines. How did we do it?
Narrator: The Oslo Accords stated at the time that Israel would gradually hand over territories to the Palestinians in three different pulses, unless the territories in question had settlements or military sites. This is where Netanyahu found a loophole.
Netanyahu: No one said what defined military sites. Defined military sites, I said, were security zones. As far as I’m concerned, the Jordan Valley is a defined military site.
Woman: Right [laughs]…The Beit She’an Valley.
Netanyahu: How can you tell. How can you tell? But then the question came up of just who would define what Defined Military Sites were. I received a letter — to me and to Arafat, at the same time — which said that Israel, and only Israel, would be the one to define what those are, the location of those military sites and their size. Now, they did not want to give me that letter, so I did not give the Hebron Agreement. I stopped the government meeting, I said: “I’m not signing.” Only when the letter came, in the course of the meeting, to me and to Arafat, only then did I sign the Hebron Agreement. Or rather, ratify it, it had already been signed. Why does this matter? Because at that moment I actually stopped the Oslo Accord.
Woman: And despite that, one of our own people, excuse me, who knew it was a swindle, and that we were going to commit suicide with the Oslo Accord, gives them — for example — Hebron…
Netanyahu: Indeed, Hebron hurts. It hurts. It’s the thing that hurts. One of the famous rabbis, whom I very much respect, a rabbi of Eretz Yisrael, he said to me: “What would your father say?” I went to my father. Do you know a little about my father’s position?
…He’s not exactly a lily-white dove, as they say. So my father heard the question and said: “Tell the rabbi that your grandfather, Rabbi Natan Milikowski, was a smart Jew. Tell him it would be better to give two percent than to give a hundred percent. And that’s the choice here. You gave two percent and in that way you stopped the withdrawal. Instead of a hundred percent.” The trick is not to be there and be broken. The trick is to be there and pay a minimal price.”
At a point in the middle of the video Netanayhu asks the camera man to stop taping, but he continues…
Netanyahu says what he really thinks for the first time:
He brags about how easy is to manipulate the USA and he proudly explains how he sabotaged the Oslo process
There is a report from PressTV which has appeared on YouTube: Allegedly the US and British intelligence agencies have created a video showing Iranian military involvement in the war in Afghanistan. According to PressTV, (which is Iranian), this video is fake.
Also, this is the second time I found this video, the first video link posted has since disappeared …from YouTube and facebook. Here is the report:
Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad says the US compelled the UN Security Council to impose sanctions against Iran in order to weaken the country and lay the ground for a military attack.
“The world is made to believe once again the lie that Israel’s existence is being threatened by a nuclear armed Iran,” Mohamad said at the opening of the Breaking the Gaza Siege summit in Kuala Lumpur.
He went on to add that these sanctions were adopted despite the fact that Mohamed ElBaradei, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), had repeatedly stated that there is no evidence of Iran pursuing military nuclear program.
Mohamad said that the US followed the same pattern in its previous war against Iraq, and attacked Baghdad after weakening the country by imposing crippling sanctions against it.
The former Malaysian premier added, “It is a matter of time before the war criminals in Israel and the United States launch another war of aggression, once Iran has been weakened by sanctions.”
The one-day International Conference on Breaking the Gaza Siege is expected to conclude with a clear plan on measures and efforts to be undertaken to challenge the siege and eventually put an end to it.
Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking in Shahr-e-Kord, June 16, 2010.
Iranian president says ‘West allows everybody to question prophets and even God but not to open the black box of a historic event.’
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad questioned the historic dimensions of the Holocaust but rejected the label of an anti-Semite, the Fars news agency reported Friday.
“The West made a claim – about the Holocaust – and urges all the people in the world to accept it or otherwise go to prison,” Ahmadinejad told a group of Islamic scholars Thursday in Nigeria, where he attended a summit of the Developing Eight, a group of countries with large Muslim populations.
“The West allows everybody to question prophets and even God but not to pose a simple question and open the black box of a historic event,” he charged.
Ahmadinejad had earlier sparked international fury by calling for the eradication of Israel from the Middle East and its relocation to Europe or North America and by describing the murders of 6 million European Jews by Germany’s Nazi regime as a “fairy tale.”
He said Thursday that the Holocaust was an excuse for Israel and the West to take land away from millions of Palestinians and give it to Israel.
Iran does not recognize Israel and maintains that a referendum by all Palestinians, including refugees, and Jews should decide the future fate of a Palestinian state.
“We are after a diplomatic settlement through a referendum, but they [the West] say Ahmadinejad wants to kill people and is an anti-Semite,” the Iranian president said.
“No, this is wrong,” he added. “I love all Muslims, Christians and Jews. What I dislike are the Zionists, which are a party that has availed itself of the Holocaust as an excuse to establish the illegitimate state of Israel.”
The West fears the political differences between Iran and Israel might lead to a military confrontation between the two countries. The international concern has increased amid fears that Iran might be using its nuclear program to make an atomic bomb.
Iran possesses 2,000-kilometer range missiles capable of targeting any part of Israel.
Tehran has said it has no secret nuclear projects and all its military capabilities were merely for the purpose of self-defense and deterrence.
But Tehran also warned that if Israel attacks the country’s nuclear sites, Iran would use its missiles to bomb Israel in retaliation.
Bruce Riedel is Obama’s chief adviser on the war in Afghanistan and the father of the ill-advised “surge”, which calls for tens of thousands more U.S. troops to be sent to the failing campaign. Riedel is employed in a Mossad-funded think tank run by an Israeli friend of Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres. Is this the ”change” Americans really wanted?
Bruce O. Riedel headed the White House Afghan war strategy team that advised President Obama to send 50,000 more U.S. troops in early 2009. With the chaos and bloodshed in Afghanistan increasing every month, Riedel is often interviewed these days- but never identified as a hired gun of the Israeli operative Haim (Chaim) Saban, who happens to be a close friend and partner-in-crime of Ehud Barak, the Israeli defense chief. Recognizing Obama’s Zionist war planners is essential to understanding what the war in Afghanistan is really all about.
Bruce Riedel at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. Riedel, a C.I.A. veteran, works for Haim Saban, a Zionist zealot and Ehud Barak’s friend and partner-in-crime.
Haim Saban (right) with Shimon Peres, Ted Koppel, and Bill Clinton at the Saban Forum in Jerusalem 2006. Saban has given more than $10 million to the Clintons…
…which buys a lot of clout with Obama’s secretary of state, a middle class girl from Park Ridge, Illinois.
Saban (left) with Condoleezza Rice, Tony Blair, and Ehud Olmert. Saban is Mossad’s bagman for the biggest war criminals of our time. A little Mossad money goes a long way when placed in the right hands. Ehud Olmert, the Israeli Likudnik prime minister, was on a secret mission in New York City on 9-11. Why has his New York visit been kept secret by the media in the United States?
Shimon Peres, the President of Israel and father of its illegal nuclear arsenal, has been a close friend of Saban’s for more than twenty years. As Saban has said, “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”
Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and CEO of News Corporation and FOX News is a close friend and long-time business partner of Haim Saban. Murdoch and Saban are seen here at the annual Allen & Co.’s media summit in Sun Valley, Idaho, on July 8, 2009. Murdoch helped make Saban a billionaire in 2001, when they sold a joint venture, Fox Family Worldwide, to Michael Eisner, of Disney. In a typical Mossad money arrangement, Saban made one and a half billion dollars, the biggest cash transaction by an individual in the history of Hollywood. Through the use of a fraudulent tax shelter, Saban paid no ($0) tax on his gain of $1.5 billion. The Fox Family channel was clearly not worth anywhere near that much money.
Saban had enlisted Stanley P. Gold, a Zionist director of Disney and founder/chairman of it’s Shamrock Israel Growth Fund, to pressure Eisner to acquire the network. Eisner agreed to pay $5.3 billion (including more than two billion dollars of debt) for the company—about a billion dollars more than News Corp. executives had believed it would bring. Gold was also chairman of Koor Industries and Tadiran Communications, two Israeli companies closely tied to Israeli military intelligence. Why would a Disney director linked to Israeli intelligence want to buy a failing network for a highly inflated price? This is a commonly used Israeli method to enrich its operatives so they can Influence the public and buy the politicians (like the Clintons) to serve Israel. The Clintons service to a foreign state (Israel) in exchange for millions of dollars is treasonous.
Rupert Murdoch, an Australian Jewish agent of Israel, is very close to Shimon Peres. Murdoch’s FOX News tried to smear Christopher Bollyn as an anti-Semite. Murdoch’s son James, heir apparent of the New Corporation media empire, is married to Eric Hufschmid’s sister. Hufschmid continues to attack Bollyn. What a small world!
The Governor of California, the Austrian bodybuilder-cum-movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger, attended the Saban Forum in Jerusalem in November 2009. The mystery of what happened to the economy of the Golden State becomes less mysterious when one considers Schwarzenegger’s close ties to Zionist criminals.
While there are 150 current news articles in which Bruce Riedel is quoted on the war in Afghanistan or the alleged Russian spies of New York, not one of them informs the reader that Riedel works for the Israeli Mossadnik of Hollywood, Haim Saban. Such glaring omissions are purely intentional.
ISRAEL’S “GREAT GATSBY”
Saban, an Israeli citizen, has given more money, more than $13 million, than any other American to support candidates, political-action committees, and campaign committees since 1999, according to the Federal Election Commission. In 2006, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz dubbed him “a kind of Great Gatsby. Our Great Gatsby.”
A recent article, “The Influencer” in the New Yorker, explains Saban’s (i.e. Mossad’s) strategy in crafting U.S. foreign policy to benefit Ehud Barak and his gang of Zionist terrorists:
Saban’s greatest concern, he says, is to protect Israel. At a conference in Israel, Saban described his formula. His “three ways to be influential in American politics,” he said, were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets. In 2002, he contributed seven million dollars toward the cost of a new building for the Democratic National Committee—one of the largest known donations ever made to an American political party. That year, he also founded the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution…By far his most important relationship is with Bill and Hillary Clinton. In 2002, Saban donated five million dollars to Bill Clinton’s Presidential library, and he has given more than five million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
Saban has a reputation as a brutal businessman.
A classic Hollywood story retold in Portfolio involves Gene Simmons of Kiss:
In the late ’90s, as co-owner of the Fox Family Channel, Saban was developing shows for children. Simmons, the fire-breathing, blood-spitting frontman of a rock band in costumes and face paint, pitched Saban an idea for a new Saturday-morning cartoon: Kiss meets X-Men, the Marvel comics superhero team. Saban liked the concept well enough to convene a meeting with Avi Arad, then C.E.O. of Marvel’s toy division.
At the appointed time, Saban, Arad, and Simmons sat down. The meeting was going well, and the three began to haggle over numbers. Then Saban turned to Arad and, referring to Simmons, confided in Hebrew, “Now we gut him like a fish.” Without missing a beat, Simmons—who, unbeknownst to Saban, was born Chaim Witz in Haifa, Israel—replied in Hebrew, “You asshole. I’m one of you.”
Israeli Rock – Gene Simmons (aka Chaim Witz) of Kiss
In January 2001, a law suit was filed in Israel’s High Court calling for criminal charges to be brought against Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Los Angeles television producer Chaim Saban. The court papers allege that on March 25, 1999, a month and half before Israel’s national elections, Saban hosted a campaign fund-raiser in his Beverly Hills home for then prime minister candidate Barak in violation of Israeli election laws. The 35 to 40 guests who attended the parlor meeting were each asked to donate $10,000 to benefit the Barak campaign.
Haim Saban’s friend Ehud Barak is the main suspect of being the mastermind of 9-11 and the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers.
Saban promised to match each donation to Barak, dollar for dollar. On the evening of the fund-raiser Barak flew into L.A. and spoke before the parlor meeting held in Saban’s home and contributions were solicited…
One guest at the fund raising event, businessman Daniel Dilbort, the president of L.A.’s Nu Image productions, admitted to Israel’s leading daily Yediot Aharanot, that the participants understood that they were donating to Barak’s campaign: “We knew we were donating to Barak’s election campaign, but we did not know where the money was going exactly,” Dilbort says he wrote a check for $10,000 that evening.
AFGHANISTAN CHAOS
June 2010 was the deadliest month of the nine-year Afghanistan war, with more than 102 NATO troops killed. Of those killed in June, at least 54 were U.S. soldiers. The United States has lost 1,066 soldiers in Afghanistan in a military campaign that has gone on longer than World War II, but Obama is sending tens of thousands more young Americans to “surge” in a disastrous war that no one seems to understand. Exposing the Zionists behind Obama’s war policy is essential to understanding why we are engaged in this most ill-advised and criminal of wars.
The increasing toll from the 9-year war in Afghanistan
Source: iCasualties.org
Sgt. Brian Keith spends his last moments with his wife, Sara, and his son Stephen, 6 months, before going off to Obama’s war in Afghanistan. Sgt. Keith, of the 10th Mountain Division from Fort Drum, New York, is among the thousands of Americans being sent to Afghanistan as part of Obama’s surge. Americans have no idea why their loved ones are fighting and dying in Afghanistan. (Photo – New York Times)
NORWEGIANS KILLED
Norwegian military officials released the names of the four soldiers killed by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan on Sunday, June 27. Defense Minister Grete Faremo, her voice cracking with emotion, said she will be among those bringing their bodies home. “We have lost four of our best soldiers,” Faremo said.
Simen Tokle, age 24, from Ballangen in Nordland County
Christian Lian, age 31, from Kristiansand in southern Norway
Andreas Eldjarn, age 21, from Tromsø in northern Norway
Trond André Bolle, age 41, from Lena in Toten (Oppland County)
“Norway is a small country. We have no one to lose.” Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said Monday that the four soldiers “were among the finest we have,” and that their deaths are “a gruesome reminder” of how dangerous their military assignment was. Norway has 470 troops in Afghanistan.
But why are Norwegian troops in Afghanistan in the first place? Why are tens of thousands of young Europeans, Canadians, Australians, and Americans slogging away in the Hindu Kush? What is the real mission of this international military campaign that has dragged on for nearly 9 years? What deals have been struck, what promises made to those who have sent their fighting men to the bloody quagmire in Afghanistan?
THINKING CLEARLY ABOUT AFGHANISTAN
To understand why thousands of young Americans and Europeans are fighting and dying in Afghanistan we need to be very clear about the real reasons for this nine-year-old military invasion and occupation. Some straight talk and Socratic dialectic will help us to determine what this war is really about – and what it isn’t.
President Obama adopted the seven-year-old war (in 2008) and the Bush administration’s reasoning for it, claiming that the United States is occupying Afghanistan because of 9-11. The terrorists behind 9-11, according to the Obama and Bush administrations, were members of the Al Qaida organization headed by Osama Bin Laden. This Islamic terrorist organization was based in Afghanistan under the Taliban regime and presented a threat to the whole world, which is why an international coalition was put together to fight against it.
The claim that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida were behind 9-11, however, has been proven false. While the U.S. government never actually proved that these parties were involved in the terror attacks, the discovery of large amounts of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center has now exposed this claim to be nothing but a complete fabrication. The government and media version of 9-11 contradicts both the scientific evidence and the laws of physics. It is impossible for both to be valid. The laws of physics and the evidence are true; the government version is clearly false. Al Qaida neither produced nor applied the extremely explosive super-thermite that pulverized the Twin Towers on 9-11. The role of Osama Bin Laden was simply that of the scapegoat in a false-flag operation; neither he nor the Taliban had anything to do with the destruction of the Twin Towers.
The Twin Towers were pulverized with a highly energetic form of super-thermite. Al Qaida and the Taliban of Afghanistan clearly had nothing to do with the murderous demolition of the World Trade Center.
If the people who run the C.I.A. and the U.S. government know about the discovery of super-thermite and explosives in the World Trade Center, why do they continue to wage war in Afghanistan?
Well, we know Afghanistan’s production of opium has increased greatly under the U.S.-led occupation. It was recently reported that use of opiate drugs, including heroin and opium, has doubled in Afghanistan since 2005, with nearly 3 percent of the adult population now addicted. Prior to the U.S. invasion in 2001, the Taliban regime had virtually eradicated the production of opium. Increased production of opium is clearly one of the results of the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan, but is that the only reason?
Afghanistan is also one of the crown jewels of Asia, extremely well endowed with rare minerals and gems, and situated between Russia, Turkmenistan, China, Pakistan, Iran, and the West. To control Afghanistan is to control one of the wealthiest and most important strategic corridors in the world. This is why the Soviet Union tried to occupy Afghanistan in the 1980s and why the U.S.-led coalition has tried to do the same since 2001. Besides its enormous wealth of rare and strategic minerals, Afghanistan is located between the Israeli-owned gas fields of Turkmenistan and the energy-starved markets of India and China. If Afghanistan were brought under U.S. and Zionist control, the planned TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) gas pipeline through Kandahar would bring billions of dollars into Mossad’s coffers every year. This is the real reason why Ehud Barak and Haim Saban are pushing for the conquest of Afghanistan. These people will use every trick in the book to see this pipeline built, but how many people must die for Israeli profits?
Who are the people behind the crafting of the war policy in Afghanistan?
We can easily identify two groups who are pushing the war policy in Afghanistan: the C.I.A. and the Israelis. The C.I.A. is clearly waging its own war in Afghanistan and Pakistan with its use of drone-launched missiles while the Israelis have called for the U.S. invasion of the country from the beginning. Ehud Barak, the current Israeli defense minister, was actually the first person to call for the invasion of Afghanistan, which he did on 9-11, only minutes after the demolition of the World Trade Center, on the BBC.
OBAMA’S WAR FOR ISRAEL
While a great deal has been written recently about the war in Afghanistan following the resignation of General Stanley A. McChrystal, I have yet to see one article that correctly identifies the real impetus behind the war effort. Most Americans believe, as President Obama says, that the war is being waged because the Taliban regime supported the terrorists who carried out 9-11. This is utterly false, as the discovery of super-thermite amply proves. The false-flag terror of 9-11, the war in Afghanistan, and the larger “War on Terror” are all Zionist-constructed frauds that are protected and promoted by the Zionist-controlled White House, Congress, and media.
To understand that the “War on Terror” (with its invasion and occupation of Afghanistan) is a Zionist construct, it is helpful to review the Israeli role in its development and realization:
·PREPARING THE GROUND – The idea of the “War on Terror” and its conceptual framework was first articulated and promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel’s Yonatan Institute of Terrorism in the early 1980s in a series of speeches, seminars, articles, and books. The basic idea is that Israel’s survival required that the militaries of the United States and Europe be stationed in the Middle East to defeat and occupy the states that support terrorism – on a long-term basis. Terrorism, or a state that supports terrorism, as defined by the Israeli doctrine, is any act (or state) of resistance against Israeli hegemony and aggression. The “War on Terror” doctrine was taught to highest-level U.S. leaders, such as George H.W. Bush, who attended the first conference of the Yonatan Institute of Terrorism in 1979. Netanyahu is a former soldier of Israel’s elite Sayeret Matkal and served under Ehud Barak, his commander.
·CREATING THE CATALYST – The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 were Israeli-designed and managed events. Ehud Barak, the chief of secret operations for the Israeli military, came to the United States in early 2001 to supervise the preparation of the crime. He was a partner in an Israeli firm, SCP Partners, which owned metallurgical companies that specialized in manufacturing nano-composites, exactly like the super-thermite that demolished the World Trade Center on 9-11.
·INTERPRETING THE EVENT – Ehud Barak happened to be in London on 9-11, ready and willing to appear on BBC World television just minutes after the demolition of the Twin Towers. Barak was clearly well prepared to interpret the terror attacks for the English-speaking world. Without a single piece of evidence, Barak blamed Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida and called for the U.S. and the western democracies to invade Afghanistan. The Zionist-controlled media completely supported Barak’s interpretation of 9-11 and refused to address the unanswered questions or evidence of Israeli involvement in the attacks.
·CONTROLLING THE INVESTIGATION – Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and son of a Mossad agent, was Assistant Attorney General in charge of the criminal division of the Department of Justice on 9-11. As the top boss of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which had a complete novice as its director, Chertoff was well positioned to control the investigation by confiscating and destroying crucial evidence, such as more than 99 percent of the steel from the destroyed Twin Towers. While the real evidence was being confiscated, false evidence, such as passports of the alleged hijackers, was “found” and used by Chertoff to create the myth that Al Qaida had hijacked the planes and destroyed the World Trade Center.
·SHAPING THE ZEITGEIST – Chertoff was instrumental in drafting the draconian legislation named the USA PATRIOT Act, which reinforced the idea that the United States was under attack and that our cherished civil liberties would have to be sacrificed in order to wage a global “War on Terror.” A department of Homeland Security was established, which Chertoff became the head of – after he completed his critical task overseeing the “non-investigation” of 9-11.
·MANAGING THE WARS – Zionist advisers, the unelected Neo-Cons, pushed for U.S. military invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Promoted by the controlled media, the Zionist hawks used every trick in the book, including outright lies, to convince the public and policy makers that sending hundreds of thousands of U.S. soldiers into the Middle East on an open-ended mission was the only way to prevent another 9-11 atrocity. Most of these advisers are die-hard Zionist zealots with strong attachments to Israeli military intelligence.
·OBAMA’S WAR FOR ISRAEL – Elected on a promise of “change”, the Zionist-controlled Barack Obama conducted a review of the seven-year-old war in Afghanistan. Bruce O. Riedel, a veteran C.I.A. officer, was named to chair the White House review. Riedel, a senior fellow of the Chaim Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution, is an employee of Chaim Saban, an Israeli “billionaire” operative in Hollywood who is an ardent supporter (and partner in crime) of Ehud Barak. Not surprisingly, Riedel advises Obama to increase the war effort in Afghanistan and send tens of thousands more U.S. troops to try to pacify the U.S.-occupied Central Asian nation.
With Israeli criminals crafting U.S. war policies in Afghanistan, the prognosis is for more violence and terrorism.
“New Law Suit calls for the Arrest of Hollywood Mogul Chaim Saban and Israeli Prime Minister – Fox Kids Worldwide CEO Alleged To Have Aided Barak in Campaign Fund-Raising Plot”, IMRA Newsletter (Israel), January 7, 2001 http://www.kokhavivpublications.com/2001/israel/jan/08/0801010001.html
Millions of Americans are aware that Israel and the Mossad had a hand in the 9/11 attacks. It is impossible to believe that Benjamin Netanyahu was not a central player in the plot. He had intimate connections to Israeli intelligence, a close friendship with Larry Silverstein, and a shared ideology with the zionists in the Bush administration.
Larry Silverstein, the World trade Center landlord, was so close to Netanyahu that “Bibi” called Larry every Sunday.
Richard Perle wrote A Clean break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm for Netanahu, and presented the document to him while he was Prime Minister of Israel.
Shortly after 9/11 Netanyahu made this statement:
“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”
In 1995 Benjamin Netanyahu wrote Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists.
On page 52 of that book he asks the following question:
“What road should the United States and other democracies pursue if they are to overcome not only the domestic terror of Oklahoma City but the potentially much more insidious international terror which produced the [1993] World Trade Center bombing, and which may very well produce other such tragedies before it has been defeated?”
Netanyahu was in New York on 9/11.
Over nine years later, this zionist pig has the nerve to address the American People on Independence Day, and with an American Flag as a backdrop!
Unlike the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein actually owned WTC 7, the 47-story building that fell straight down into it’s footprint at about 5:25 p.m. on 9-11, in what was clearly a controlled demolition. All three towers demolished on 9-11 were under Silverstein’s control and although he openly admitted on camera that he had decided to “pull” WTC 7, his revealing comments have never been investigated by the authorities of New York City or the federal government. 
Why did the Germans begin rounding up the Jews and interning them in the concentration camps to begin with? Contrary to popular myth, the Jews remained “free” inside Germany – albeit subject to laws which did restrict certain of their privileges – prior to the outbreak of World War II.
The fact that Obama is the product of a network of wealthy Jewish financiers is certainly no secret to the Jews. This is the cover of the Chicago Jewish News of October 24, 2008.
